Comments on: I do (not!) http://whyifeelcrazy.com/?p=450 no wrong answers Thu, 15 Jul 2010 20:11:21 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9 hourly 1 By: jes http://whyifeelcrazy.com/?p=450&cpage=1#comment-192 jes Wed, 07 Oct 2009 19:10:15 +0000 http://whyifeelcrazy.com/?p=450#comment-192 That type of thinking is what freaks out American conservatives about gay marriage/civil unions. If we open it up, everyone will want to be polygamous or marry their dogs! To quote the lovely senator from my home state, Rick Santorum: “Marriage is not about affirming somebody’s love for somebody else. It’s about uniting together to be open to children, to further civilization in our society.” and of course ... “In every society, the definition of marriage has not ever to my knowledge included homosexuality. That's not to pick on homosexuality. It's not, you know, man on child, man on dog, or whatever the case may be. It is one thing. And when you destroy that you have a dramatic impact on the quality.” and just one more bonus quote... “[I have] a problem with homosexual acts, as I would with what I would consider to be acts outside of traditional heterosexual relationships . . . if the Supreme Court says that you have the right to consensual [gay] sex within your home, then you have the right to bigamy, you have the right to polygamy, you have the right to incest, you have the right to adultery.” There you go, Santorum has spoken! That type of thinking is what freaks out American conservatives about gay marriage/civil unions. If we open it up, everyone will want to be polygamous or marry their dogs!

To quote the lovely senator from my home state, Rick Santorum:

“Marriage is not about affirming somebody’s love for somebody else. It’s about uniting together to be open to children, to further civilization in our society.”

and of course …

“In every society, the definition of marriage has not ever to my knowledge included homosexuality. That’s not to pick on homosexuality. It’s not, you know, man on child, man on dog, or whatever the case may be. It is one thing. And when you destroy that you have a dramatic impact on the quality.”

and just one more bonus quote…

“[I have] a problem with homosexual acts, as I would with what I would consider to be acts outside of traditional heterosexual relationships . . . if the Supreme Court says that you have the right to consensual [gay] sex within your home, then you have the right to bigamy, you have the right to polygamy, you have the right to incest, you have the right to adultery.”

There you go, Santorum has spoken!

]]>