if you could write to yourself 20 years from now, what would you say?

In 2007 an old friend of mine died. Between 1995 and 2006 we had lost touch but in the spring of 2007 I found her on facebook and the following December she died of colorectal cancer. Her widow gave me a bag containing fourteen letters I’d written to her between 1986 and 1993.

Anne had a great mind and a magic heart. At university we met in first year residence. Talking politics and phylosophy with her was bliss. We sharpened each other’s minds. When we reconnected in 2007 it was joyous and heartfilling. It turned out she lived just a couple of hours away and we met for lunch. When I heard her laugh, eleven years evaporated.

We are in many ways the sum of all our relationships. In some cases this is baggage, in others – the precious bits of ourselves we can adore. Anne’s absence is finite now but the glints of me shaped in her presence continues to grow.

The letters I wrote to Anne are candid and passionately youthful. Our mutual admiration and deep trust are implicit in what seem now like offerings of my rawest truths. Experiences and beliefs birthing out of my life sometimes even as I wrote. Halfway through reading the letters I realized I had unknowingly written to myself twenty years in the future.

Somehow, with this blog, I want to share and integrate the message I wrote myself. And at the same time honour a woman who inspired a lot of people to find their best. It’s going to be fun.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter

i want a tax gap

US Stats on race/gender wage gap

The 2009 Diversity Profile of British Columbia (where I live) explores the implications of the 2006 Canada census. As always, women show up earning less than men in almost all employment categories. In my category women earn 14% less than men. The wage gap spans more than gender though, so in calculating my lost wages I’m using 10% (instead of 14%) because I have no doubt benefited from my white skin privilege (see above chart from Karen Collins Exploring Business). So, if I make a rough estimate of my average income since 1991 the result is someone owes me about $70,000.00.

What makes me REALLY crazy is that we all pay the same income tax rates!

Since changing tax law takes a long time (sigh) maybe in the meantime employers could offer a few days of “wage-gap leave” every year? Just a thought…

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter

Avatar

Warning: If you haven’t seen it then don’t read this post because I’m going to spoil the ending.

After watching this film I felt sad and a little angry. The story feels like a revisionist dream meant to fortify the collective denial of citizens of the developed world. The destruction of ecosystems and the people that live within them, as a result of mining on THIS planet is widespread and devastating. How many “trees of souls” have been eviscerated in the name of coal, gold and oil?

Avatar’s happy ending made me sad because I wish Indigenous people on Earth could have ex-marines to help them overcome military backed corporate invasion. Avatar’s $400 million dollar 3D rain forest is breathtaking, but it cannot replace the Amazon rain forest.

While researching this post I found an article dated Dec 22, 2009 entitled: The real Avatar story: indigenous people fight to save their forest homes from corporate exploitation. At the end of the article you will find links to additional articles about South American Indigenous people fighting to protect their land.

The Amazon is not the only area of our planet at risk. Do some research and check out Google Maps satellite view to see for yourself. If this film helps raise awareness about the real effects of mining — then maybe the $400 million was worth it, after all.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter

for Maya (1956-2009)

Maya had an old soul.

In religious practice and philosophy connected to Sikhism, Hinduism and Sufism and other related beliefs, there is an idea that one must give up the illusion of the material, dualistic world to know truth, to connect with the supreme consciousness, or god. This illusion is known as Maya.

But Maya is not just a bunch of stuff that isn’t really there. Maya is the veiling power of the supreme consciousness. Maya is also described as the illusion of life. In other words: do you know you are dreaming if you do not wake up?

Meditation, yoga and chanting are all practices that lift the veil of Maya.

And why lift the veil? Because unity with the divine is the goal. Grooving with the ultimate interconnectedness of everything is much better than the selfish pursuit of material gain. But herein lies a paradox, for it is only the self that can lead one beyond the veil of Maya.

It is sometimes said that when the supreme consciousness first manifested, it manifested Maya as its shadow. Enlightenment is only possible because there IS a veil to lift between our consciousness and the divine truth. Were it not there, we would not have the opportunity for the sweet sweet rapture of knowing oneness. We would already BE oneness, without Maya.

And of course, you knew all this! You were an avid reader, a Buddhist, a smartypants and you had such a huge, bright spirit. So even in the hurt and shock of the aftermath of your well timed exit I have to smile. For here we are saying goodbye to Maya. Speaking in low voices and trying to understand why Maya couldn’t get the support she needed. Cuddling under blankets against the cold November air and asking each other: why couldn’t Maya see her own beautiful light?

I am smiling because you have left us with a spell on our lips for opening the magic door.

Thank you Maya. For many things but especially your courage. I am glad I knew you. And I know in my heart your return to the light was swift and sure.

This is love: to fly toward a secret sky, to cause a hundred veils to fall each moment. First to let go of life. Finally, to take a step without feet. –Rumi

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter

I do (not!)

What if people were allowed to designate, based on an array of criteria (that may or may not include sexual intimacy or blood relation), who shall be the person (or people) they enter into economic interdependence and/or domestic care with?

Contracts that outline roles, responsibilities and procedures could be mutually written and include clear processes for dissolution. These contracts, in turn, could be recognized by regulators regarding taxes, hospital care, funerals, estate law, etc.

Those who wish to connect their conjugal relations and commitments to a spiritual or religious practice should be free to do so, and if a given religion refuses to acknowledge a specific conjugal relationship, that is that religion’s prerogative. If people want to take on the battle of changing what is acceptable in a specific religion that is between them and the religion, the state really should not be involved.

There is a very Interesting report, entitled “Beyond Conjugality: Recognizing And Supporting Close Personal Adult Relationships” prepared by the Law Commission of Canada in 2002. Among other things, it calls for changes to Family Law in recognition of our changing society.

Our current government disbanded the commission in 2007.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter

faith

Deep down I believe each decision shall take into consideration the truth that everything, especially all that is defined as “alive,” is multi-dimensionally interconnected and interdependent. Yet, I engage in a world where this is not an accepted priority except in certain silos of practice and thought.

I practice no assembled religion or spirituality. I am not an environmentalist. I am not an artist or an activist.

I do my best to bring this consciousness to everything I do.

My faith is not connected to a god or goddess; animal or angel; ritual or dogma. That said, I do feel a resonance with trees and the moon that consistently inspires awe. That’s because in my earliest years I was raised by a birch and oak tree under the stars… watching the reel of the universe.

I am inspired, ultimately, by the very complexity that supports my ability to experience faith.

Lately I feel like I am a heartbeat away from flipping a switch that calibrates me to consciously perceive the collective bodymind transmission/reception between everything alive. I am frustrated by the sensation that if I flip the switch I will go insane, unless a lot of people do it at the same time. And I am placated by the feeling that it is already happening and has been for centuries.

The photo in this post is of a very good friend of mine, Crowe River.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter

theory of the morning

So, pulling in fractals and light, chakras, electromagnetic fields, resonant mathematical equasions and love I think life is some kind of light refraction that receives and transmits. We seek to express ourselves and connect with other life. We create memory which is all we take with us when we die. The stories of people we’ve loved. But, at the same time one thing truly lives on – the memories others have of our life.

What really is memory but a narrative suspended by the birth death cycle? The story of life.

Man….we are capable of so much. It is amazing sharing this planet, isn’t it?

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter

may we have your expression, please

I’m reading a cool book. It’s called Finding Our Way by Margaret Wheatley. She writes about, among other things, how organizations can become creative, self-organizing living systems, rather than the more common highly controlled mechanistic systems that only create robotic behaviors in people.

She writes that life has two main functions: to express itself, and connect with other life. I’ve been thinking how interdependent these two functions are. When I think of my community along these lines I envision a jungle. I want diversity, micro climates, symbiotic relationships, adaptability, resilience…

Instead, humanity is being turned into a tree farm. Millions of people self-medicate to combat feeling anxious, panicky and depressed (not to mention environmental illness). I am completely convinced that feeling anxious, panicky, depressed and poisoned by the environment are naturally justifiable responses. We are creating a monoculture world many cannot comfortably inhabit. In this monoculture, people are unable to express themselves or heart-connect with other people. That means life itself is being gravely inhibited.

Fundamentally, this is about freedom. Never has human liberation been more threatened than now.

Please pay attention.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter

free the gods

All the gods are gone. It started when my god asked me to ask you to ask your god if they were interested in hooking up sometime.

Next thing you know, they’re so into each other they forgot about us. And it wasn’t just my god and your god that got together. Turns out it was happening all over the place!

Gods dating, dancing, staying up way too late having way too much fun. Drinking scotch, talking philosophy, or hosting cuddle parties… who knows what gods do? And then just like that, they’re gone.

Turns out we were so busy war shipping we didn’t notice they were lonely. Too much devotion. All this time they were longing for a reciprocal relationship. A bit of give and take. They found that in each other. Which is really beautiful. And as much as we try to be happy for them, I know we’re all a bit abashed.

And what are we left with? A lot of temples, dogma, books, wars and an undeniable urge to have faith in something.

How about life?

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter

DNA is the new medium part 2

The common ground of life has always facinated me. In my youth I collected a list of the things that all cultures seemed to share: a form of bread, a formented drink, spirituality, games, songs, a rhythm …and in many languages the word for “mother” has a similar sound.

After reading The Power of Myth my secular-raised brain was validated in its belief that although our religious stories differed, the point was the same.

I followed an esoteric path back into history and discovered the  Kabbalah, Alchemy, labyrinths and primitive patterns on clay and pottery. Eventually I traveled so far back that I found myself in the future learning about quantum mechanics, holographic models, fractals and chaos theory.

(I met some interesting folks along the way, too – but that is indeed another story. Perhaps a whole different blog.)

Looking at it in this context, DNA self-assembly facilitated by geometric boxes seems like the same thing with different tools. What are we REALLY doing? If everything we see is constructed in our brains based on the light that reflects off whatever is really “out” there then, well, I just have to wonder… what is the metta significance of these shapes?

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter

DNA is the new medium part 1

In the world of nanotechnology, scientists are working hard to figure out how to take advantage of DNA’s ability to self assemble in order to create “transistors, metamaterials and even tiny robots.” Self-assembly is what DNA does, but so far it also “clumps” which has prevented scientists from being able to maximize the self-assembly trait for this purpose.

In 2009 it was reported that Alexei Tkachenko and Nicolas Licata from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, found a way to prevent clumping by “trapping the nanoparticles in a cage where the bars are made of DNA, and then stack the cages to form nanostructures.” Also this year, Shawn Douglas and his colleagues at William Shih’s lab (Harvard) demonstrated the first systematic method for building multilayer 3D nanostructures of DNA.

This is being called the third wave of the DNA nanotech revolution and it follows recent breakthroughs like Rothemund’s development of the DNA origami technique. Willianm Shih’s lab provides open source software called cadnano for the design of three-dimensional DNA origami nanostructures.

And maybe one of the best parts of all this is the emergence of nanotech art galleries.

This image is from Shih’s talk at FNANO in 2008. These are the shapes DNA sculptors are working with. What I think is important is that they’re working with sacred geometry.

Why it’s important I still need to think through. That will be part 2.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter