letter 3: the watch

Oct 25, 1989. I’m taking a graduate-level courses to complete my undergrad degree. One is a seminar on Hemingway. I wrote this letter during class because I did not have the book being discussed: To Have and Have Not.

This room is really hot!! I took off my sweater and no one even noticed that I’m sitting here in my bra! They have been too busy talking about their definitions of what a “have” and a “have not” are… The lady beside me has a plain watch with a leather strap but she has a Kleenex under it. Like this:

…Hey! guess what I’m doing my seminar on next week? Existentialism in Hemingway. I hope to god the discussion that is spawned reaches above the already astoundingly high level of intellectual insight going on right now. Heh.

I remember discovering academic bliss when I finally ventured into interdisciplinary studies. Until then I was a big picture thinker trapped in a snapshot. Everything began to make sense when I started filling in the context around the authors we studied. Philosophy. Politics. Art.

I also remember how much I enjoyed sarcasm. I write, “[my partner] says I can be very sarcastic sometimes, it makes him mad when I’m sarcastic…I think I inherited it from my mother, who else?”

In this letter I tell Anne about my parents safely arriving at their new home on the west coast. That I’m excited I already have my plane ticket for a visit. Does that mean I did the right thing moving here myself last year? Will the challenges of this transition be worth it?

All these years later I can answer the question about the watch. Summer course in a hot humid city. The leather strap must have made her arm sweat.

All these years later I’m applying to grad school. An MA in interdisciplinary studies. Check!

All these years later and I’m making a mental note to stop censoring my sarcasm. An excellent attribute to compensate for the slow fade of youth methinks! Heh. Indeed.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter

letter 2: dad

It’s May 24, 1987 and I am making “excellent money” ($10/hour) working as a typist at a real estate appraisal company in Toronto. My partner (of 3.5 months) and I have decided to go west and I am one week from having enough money saved. According to my letter to Anne, while my mother is concerned this move will not significantly improve my career options my father is “surprisingly pretty encouraging and supportive.”

A week after this letter was written we put all our stuff and ourselves into our new-to-us lemon-yellow (never buy a yellow car) Duster and crossed from Windsor, Ontario into the United States in order to avoid going “over” the great lakes.

We re-entered Canada via Lake-of-the-Woods and despite the best effort of the border guards and their dogs, no drugs were found. After we repacked everything we decided to look for somewhere to stop for the night. Following campground signs, we were driving slowly down a back road when the bottom of the car sorta collapsed. In the gathering dusk we looked underneath and saw that most of the engine was resting on the road. We learned later an old weld had failed.

Two weeks later, after some lovely camping at a place aptly called “Journey’s End,” we returned, sans car, to Windsor. I went back to school and my partner went back to house painting. Two years later, in 1989, my parents moved to Vancouver Island and nineteen years later, in 2008 I finally did too.

Dad as a young man

Dad as a young man

Which brings me back to dad. He was duly sacrificed to the work gods so I didn’t see him much growing up. Then, immediately after retiring, he moved across the country with mum while I stayed in Ontario. For the next nineteen years my relationship with my parents consisted of long phone calls with mum and visits every ten months or so. Occasionally I talked with dad too, but dads are not phoners.

Since moving to Vancouver Island I’ve been getting to know him, in some ways for the first time. What I didn’t realize when I was young is that this man is my number one champion. We have always got along easily… cut from the same cloth, as they say…

But it’s more than that.

My mother did most of the parenting when I was young and her strong personality and role as lead worrier and communicator kinda eclipsed my father from my perspective. When I read the letter I wrote back in 1987 it confirmed for me what I am discovering now, in 2010. Dad actually loves me unconditionally. And, although I never knew it, he’s always had my back!

It’s impossible to re-live the past but if I could I would know a lot less fear.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter

letter 1: choices

Background: It’s 1986, I am twenty and temping for the summer at Wood Gundy’s Toronto head office.

I wish I didn’t understand so much – I realize now why (or at least partially why) so much of this world is fucked. When a person works five days a week – 8 hours a day, they want to have fun the remaining time. The tension/stress/anxiety of working is as much as people can handle. This is why nobody cares – they fucking well don’t feel like it! Help! I hate this lifestyle. This mindless complacent world – I will not choose much from this summer to become a part of me – or my reality that I am forming. Bleck! Yick!

We were both in second year university. Earlier in the summer she had stayed for a week with me at my parents. She didn’t come out to me for another three years, and I didn’t come out for almost a decade.

I am beginning to become quite detached from the opposite sex…I hope it is a stage – but what I really need is someone to renew my faith. It’s nice to have J around again – we get along quite well. He is still a special person. But I will lie and say I’ve got VD before I’d sleep with him again. I feel strange these days…

…I miss you Anne, so far you have been the best part of my summer. D and K really like you – K said, “I’ve never heard anyone laugh like that before.”

When Anne and I reconnected in 2008 her laugh had the power to evaporate time. I play it back so I will remember it always, but it fades anyway.

Take care Anne, win awards! with love…

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter

if you could write to yourself 20 years from now, what would you say?

In 2008 an old friend of mine died. Between 1995 and 2007 we had lost touch but in the spring of 2008 I found her on facebook and the following December she died of colorectal cancer. Her widow gave me a bag containing fourteen letters I’d written to her between 1986 and 1993.

Anne had a great mind and a magic heart. At university we met in first year residence. Talking politics and philosophy with her was bliss. We sharpened each other’s minds. When we reconnected in 2008 it was joyous and heartfilling. It turned out she lived just a couple of hours away and we met for lunch. When I heard her laugh, a dozen years evaporated.

We are in many ways the sum of all our relationships. In some cases this is baggage, in others – the precious bits of ourselves we can adore. Anne’s absence is finite now but the glints of me shaped in her presence continue to grow.

The letters I wrote to Anne are candid and passionately youthful. Our mutual admiration and deep trust are implicit in what seem now like offerings of my rawest truths. Experiences and beliefs birthing out of my life sometimes even as I wrote. Halfway through reading the letters I realized I had unknowingly written to myself twenty years in the future.

Somehow, with this blog, I want to share and integrate the message I wrote myself. And at the same time honour a woman who inspired a lot of people to find their best. It’s going to be fun.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter

i want a tax gap

US Stats on race/gender wage gap

The 2009 Diversity Profile of British Columbia (where I live) explores the implications of the 2006 Canada census. As always, women show up earning less than men in almost all employment categories. In my category women earn 14% less than men. The wage gap spans more than gender though, so in calculating my lost wages I’m using 10% (instead of 14%) because I have no doubt benefited from my white skin privilege (see above chart from Karen Collins Exploring Business). So, if I make a rough estimate of my average income since 1991 the result is someone owes me about $70,000.00.

What makes me REALLY crazy is that we all pay the same income tax rates!

Since changing tax law takes a long time (sigh) maybe in the meantime employers could offer a few days of “wage-gap leave” every year? Just a thought…

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter

Avatar

Warning: If you haven’t seen it then don’t read this post because I’m going to spoil the ending.

After watching this film I felt sad and a little angry. The story feels like a revisionist dream meant to fortify the collective denial of citizens of the developed world. The destruction of ecosystems and the people that live within them, as a result of mining on THIS planet is widespread and devastating. How many “trees of souls” have been eviscerated in the name of coal, gold and oil?

Avatar’s happy ending made me sad because I wish Indigenous people on Earth could have ex-marines to help them overcome military backed corporate invasion. Avatar’s $400 million dollar 3D rain forest is breathtaking, but it cannot replace the Amazon rain forest.

While researching this post I found an article dated Dec 22, 2009 entitled: The real Avatar story: indigenous people fight to save their forest homes from corporate exploitation. At the end of the article you will find links to additional articles about South American Indigenous people fighting to protect their land.

The Amazon is not the only area of our planet at risk. Do some research and check out Google Maps satellite view to see for yourself. If this film helps raise awareness about the real effects of mining — then maybe the $400 million was worth it, after all.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter

for Maya (1956-2009)

Maya had an old soul.

In religious practice and philosophy connected to Sikhism, Hinduism and Sufism and other related beliefs, there is an idea that one must give up the illusion of the material, dualistic world to know truth, to connect with the supreme consciousness, or god. This illusion is known as Maya.

But Maya is not just a bunch of stuff that isn’t really there. Maya is the veiling power of the supreme consciousness. Maya is also described as the illusion of life. In other words: do you know you are dreaming if you do not wake up?

Meditation, yoga and chanting are all practices that lift the veil of Maya.

And why lift the veil? Because unity with the divine is the goal. Grooving with the ultimate interconnectedness of everything is much better than the selfish pursuit of material gain. But herein lies a paradox, for it is only the self that can lead one beyond the veil of Maya.

It is sometimes said that when the supreme consciousness first manifested, it manifested Maya as its shadow. Enlightenment is only possible because there IS a veil to lift between our consciousness and the divine truth. Were it not there, we would not have the opportunity for the sweet sweet rapture of knowing oneness. We would already BE oneness, without Maya.

And of course, you knew all this! You were an avid reader, a Buddhist, a smartypants and you had such a huge, bright spirit. So even in the hurt and shock of the aftermath of your well timed exit I have to smile. For here we are saying goodbye to Maya. Speaking in low voices and trying to understand why Maya couldn’t get the support she needed. Cuddling under blankets against the cold November air and asking each other: why couldn’t Maya see her own beautiful light?

I am smiling because you have left us with a spell on our lips for opening the magic door.

Thank you Maya. For many things but especially your courage. I am glad I knew you. And I know in my heart your return to the light was swift and sure.

This is love: to fly toward a secret sky, to cause a hundred veils to fall each moment. First to let go of life. Finally, to take a step without feet. –Rumi

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter

I do (not!)

What if people were allowed to designate, based on an array of criteria (that may or may not include sexual intimacy or blood relation), who shall be the person (or people) they enter into economic interdependence and/or domestic care with?

Contracts that outline roles, responsibilities and procedures could be mutually written and include clear processes for dissolution. These contracts, in turn, could be recognized by regulators regarding taxes, hospital care, funerals, estate law, etc.

Those who wish to connect their conjugal relations and commitments to a spiritual or religious practice should be free to do so, and if a given religion refuses to acknowledge a specific conjugal relationship, that is that religion’s prerogative. If people want to take on the battle of changing what is acceptable in a specific religion that is between them and the religion, the state really should not be involved.

There is a very Interesting report, entitled “Beyond Conjugality: Recognizing And Supporting Close Personal Adult Relationships” prepared by the Law Commission of Canada in 2002. Among other things, it calls for changes to Family Law in recognition of our changing society.

Our current government disbanded the commission in 2007.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter

faith

Deep down I believe each decision shall take into consideration the truth that everything, especially all that is defined as “alive,” is multi-dimensionally interconnected and interdependent. Yet, I engage in a world where this is not an accepted priority except in certain silos of practice and thought.

I practice no assembled religion or spirituality. I am not an environmentalist. I am not an artist or an activist.

I do my best to bring this consciousness to everything I do.

My faith is not connected to a god or goddess; animal or angel; ritual or dogma. That said, I do feel a resonance with trees and the moon that consistently inspires awe. That’s because in my earliest years I was raised by a birch and oak tree under the stars… watching the reel of the universe.

I am inspired, ultimately, by the very complexity that supports my ability to experience faith.

Lately I feel like I am a heartbeat away from flipping a switch that calibrates me to consciously perceive the collective bodymind transmission/reception between everything alive. I am frustrated by the sensation that if I flip the switch I will go insane, unless a lot of people do it at the same time. And I am placated by the feeling that it is already happening and has been for centuries.

The photo in this post is of a very good friend of mine, Crowe River.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter

theory of the morning

So, pulling in fractals and light, chakras, electromagnetic fields, resonant mathematical equasions and love I think life is some kind of light refraction that receives and transmits. We seek to express ourselves and connect with other life. We create memory which is all we take with us when we die. The stories of people we’ve loved. But, at the same time one thing truly lives on – the memories others have of our life.

What really is memory but a narrative suspended by the birth death cycle? The story of life.

Man….we are capable of so much. It is amazing sharing this planet, isn’t it?

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter

may we have your expression, please

I’m reading a cool book. It’s called Finding Our Way by Margaret Wheatley. She writes about, among other things, how organizations can become creative, self-organizing living systems, rather than the more common highly controlled mechanistic systems that only create robotic behaviors in people.

She writes that life has two main functions: to express itself, and connect with other life. I’ve been thinking how interdependent these two functions are. When I think of my community along these lines I envision a jungle. I want diversity, micro climates, symbiotic relationships, adaptability, resilience…

Instead, humanity is being turned into a tree farm. Millions of people self-medicate to combat feeling anxious, panicky and depressed (not to mention environmental illness). I am completely convinced that feeling anxious, panicky, depressed and poisoned by the environment are naturally justifiable responses. We are creating a monoculture world many cannot comfortably inhabit. In this monoculture, people are unable to express themselves or heart-connect with other people. That means life itself is being gravely inhibited.

Fundamentally, this is about freedom. Never has human liberation been more threatened than now.

Please pay attention.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter